Boiled Sweets

I used to have a little brother.
The only memory I have about him is when I shared with him the boiled sweets I was given for tea.
Even so my brother, who was only one month old when he died, still lives on in our heart.




(You don't know why this story is scary? Think!)

Comments

Anonymous said…
わからない．．．なんで怖いの？
29 September 2007 at 03:30
Saya_In_Underworld said…
弟が死んだ原因は姉にあるということです。
死んだときは弟は生後一ヶ月と書いてありましたね？
そんな小さいのに硬い飴（boiled sweets）をあげたりしたら、窒息してしまいます。
29 September 2007 at 09:34
bokuwakuma said…
I only sort of understand. did the sweets hurt him? Then I would be a little creeped.
29 September 2007 at 10:46
Saya_In_Underworld said…
Hi bokuwaakuma

Yes that's right the baby brother probably died from suffocation!
29 September 2007 at 20:33
bokuwakuma said…
Eee. Then yes, I'm slightly peturbed.
Thank you for posting these great stories.
I'm always too afraid to watch the videos though.
30 September 2007 at 09:54
Saya_In_Underworld said…
Videos are alright once you get used to them. I used to be afraid of them too! :)

Thanks for your comment it keeps me going!
30 September 2007 at 15:45
Shoshana said…
I'm not sure but I get the feeling from "still lives on in our heart." Means that she has his heart like a trasplant, though there isn't much leading to this except a way the line I quoted could be interpreted.
2 August 2008 at 02:46
Shoshana said…
And yes I know that a month old and transplant sounds odd and impossible but I just posted spur-of-the-moment and you don't know how old the speaker is either. Or it could be the candies like stated in prior posts/
3 August 2008 at 11:39
Anonymous said…
Oh, I get it! He choked on the sweets. Very disturbing.
3 August 2008 at 15:03
Anonymous said…
he gave to sweets to his one month old brother. you don't give sweets to an infant...
9 August 2008 at 15:12
Anonymous said…
Ne, Saya-sama. The baby could've died from food poisoning. Assuming that the boiled sweet was honey though.
27 August 2008 at 20:04
Saya_In_Underworld said…
A very good guess indeed,Shin-sama!! LOL
29 August 2008 at 21:54
Anonymous said…
The poor baby!y did he give da brother boiled sweets?I bet da bro. choked n die.
2 September 2008 at 16:25
Anonymous said…
The brother is a murderer!T_T
26 September 2008 at 15:13
Anonymous said…
The brother is the sweets
5 October 2008 at 06:33
Anonymous said…
yeah, i was thinking they killed the month-old and put him into the sweets the next time..
18 October 2008 at 08:50
Anonymous said…
Uh...Poisoned sweets??But anyway,giving sweets to a month old baby is evil....
18 October 2008 at 12:59
Anonymous said…
Anonymous, from October 18- That's even better thinking!
23 March 2009 at 08:22
Anonymous said…
Could they have eaten the baby brother?!

But then that's just sick, and the last line would have to be: "Even, my little brother,... still lives in our stomachs."
heh, corny.
27 March 2009 at 17:15
Anonymous said…
they put the baby in the sweets and they ate him. :) I think
8 April 2009 at 13:35
Anonymous said…
so he killed his own brother... thats disturbing
10 September 2009 at 04:17
Anonymous said…
well then...

WHO WAS BOILED ?
3 January 2010 at 09:11
Emi said…
I think the sweets were poisoned and intended for the older child, but the child gave them to the little brother and he died instead.
14 January 2010 at 10:20
Anonymous said…
Kinda sounds like they ate the baby. Or that's just me being weird XD.

I just found this blog, I say bookmarked.
9 February 2010 at 20:58
Unknown said…
Poisoned sweets obviously.
21 April 2010 at 18:00
Tarts said…
When I read it, I took it as they KILLED the brother, did a little Hannibal Lector, and poof, now he has clogged arteries from the brother's meat and the sweets he ate? D:

I'm just awful, aren't I?
3 May 2010 at 12:46
Sienna said…
Maybe since they were boiled they burnt his insides. And then they put his boiled self in the tea, and the tea runs through the viens and into the herats so thtas why they live in there hearts.
12 May 2010 at 06:03
Anonymous said…
i see it as this: He gave the brother his sweets, did he not? so that means they meant to poison him. but apparently he's still alive, because his little brother "lives on within".
17 May 2010 at 08:47
Anonymous said…
I read it as the baby brother's ghost was being given the sweets.
18 August 2010 at 07:18
Anonymous said…
... Our heart? They share a heart? >_<

Also, cool blog. Just sayin. =P I've read most of it.
18 September 2010 at 05:47
Anonymous said…
Could it be that the two are Conjoined Twins, and one of them died after a month?
26 November 2010 at 17:49
Fai said…
The Baby wasn't even born? maybe just one month in the mother's womb when it died? So this person must be seeing the ghost of the baby and shared sweets with him. Thats what I thought
23 December 2010 at 21:40
Yoku said…
feding sweets to a one month old infant?I'd say suffocated.But It is probally true that they might have been poisoned.But they didn't poison the baby brother.
And Then, They could of eaten the brother.Well, thats only my theory.
Thanks for posting this, Saya!
24 December 2010 at 06:59
Anonymous said…
i took it as the baby brother was the sweets.
11 January 2011 at 05:30
Anonymous said…
Speaking from the perspective of a mother here: a one month old baby is incapable even of rolling over on their own or holding their head up steadily. If you give a baby a sweet at that age, that baby will choke on that sweet. No need for poison or other nonsense- just an innocent sweet choking a baby. The older brother was not aware what he did would kill his brother, but it did. It's scary because it's not only possible, it happens every once in a while.
13 January 2011 at 22:47
Anonymous said…
What I got was that the mother was trying to poison theolder child but the older child gave it to the month-old brother.
19 February 2011 at 06:32
Unknown said…
it says 'our heart' not 'our hearts' which i guess means they were conjoined twins, and he happened to be older by, you know, a few minutes (you know how twins and their parents say ones older). they gave one something to choke on, so they would have one, and the younger one died. thats what i think anyway.
10 March 2011 at 14:32
Joelle said…
You guys are thinking too much. Saya-chan said so herself, THE BABY BROTHER CHOKED ON THE SWEETS.
Geez.
19 February 2012 at 22:54
Unknown said…
Hi, Saya-san! I've just found your blog and I must say....I quite like it!

(ne, the little brother was just a month old, right? wouldn't he have choked from the boiled sweets? babies can't be trusted to be left aloe for even a few minutes!)
9 December 2012 at 16:04
Saya_In_Underworld said…
@Evil Carbonara: My, my! Your name disturbs me, dear! Can one of my favourite Italian dishes be evil?? I would be scared to taste your dish!

I'm glad you like my blog! :D

And yes I agree, all babies should put be put under 24-hr surveillance!
10 December 2012 at 03:22
Post a Comment