As always, thank you everyone for leaving comments. I'm sorry I'm too busy at the moment to make a reply to each individual comment. But I hope you enjoy the time browsing through my blog!

Friday, 28 September 2007

Boiled Sweets

I used to have a little brother.
The only memory I have about him is when I shared with him the boiled sweets I was given for tea.
Even so my brother, who was only one month old when he died, still lives on in our heart.




(You don't know why this story is scary? Think!)

40 comments:

Anonymous said...

わからない...なんで怖いの?

SAYA said...

弟が死んだ原因は姉にあるということです。
死んだときは弟は生後一ヶ月と書いてありましたね?
そんな小さいのに硬い飴(boiled sweets)をあげたりしたら、窒息してしまいます。

bokuwakuma said...

I only sort of understand. did the sweets hurt him? Then I would be a little creeped.

SAYA said...

Hi bokuwaakuma

Yes that's right the baby brother probably died from suffocation!

bokuwakuma said...

Eee. Then yes, I'm slightly peturbed.
Thank you for posting these great stories.
I'm always too afraid to watch the videos though.

SAYA said...

Videos are alright once you get used to them. I used to be afraid of them too! :)

Thanks for your comment it keeps me going!

Shoshana said...

I'm not sure but I get the feeling from "still lives on in our heart." Means that she has his heart like a trasplant, though there isn't much leading to this except a way the line I quoted could be interpreted.

Shoshana said...

And yes I know that a month old and transplant sounds odd and impossible but I just posted spur-of-the-moment and you don't know how old the speaker is either. Or it could be the candies like stated in prior posts/

Anonymous said...

Oh, I get it! He choked on the sweets. Very disturbing.

caspyr said...

he gave to sweets to his one month old brother. you don't give sweets to an infant...

Shin said...

Ne, Saya-sama. The baby could've died from food poisoning. Assuming that the boiled sweet was honey though.

SAYA said...

A very good guess indeed,Shin-sama!! LOL

Cutie gurl said...

The poor baby!y did he give da brother boiled sweets?I bet da bro. choked n die.

Sugar said...

The brother is a murderer!T_T

Ithidet said...

The brother is the sweets

Anonymous said...

yeah, i was thinking they killed the month-old and put him into the sweets the next time..

Sugar said...

Uh...Poisoned sweets??But anyway,giving sweets to a month old baby is evil....

Catty said...

Anonymous, from October 18- That's even better thinking!

Anonymous said...

Could they have eaten the baby brother?!

But then that's just sick, and the last line would have to be: "Even, my little brother,... still lives in our stomachs."
heh, corny.

Anonymous said...

they put the baby in the sweets and they ate him. :) I think

Anonymous said...

so he killed his own brother... thats disturbing

Anonymous said...

well then...

WHO WAS BOILED ?

Emi said...

I think the sweets were poisoned and intended for the older child, but the child gave them to the little brother and he died instead.

Anonymous said...

Kinda sounds like they ate the baby. Or that's just me being weird XD.

I just found this blog, I say bookmarked.

Nick Lee said...

Poisoned sweets obviously.

Tarts said...

When I read it, I took it as they KILLED the brother, did a little Hannibal Lector, and poof, now he has clogged arteries from the brother's meat and the sweets he ate? D:

I'm just awful, aren't I?

Sienna said...

Maybe since they were boiled they burnt his insides. And then they put his boiled self in the tea, and the tea runs through the viens and into the herats so thtas why they live in there hearts.

Anonymous said...

i see it as this: He gave the brother his sweets, did he not? so that means they meant to poison him. but apparently he's still alive, because his little brother "lives on within".

Anonymous said...

I read it as the baby brother's ghost was being given the sweets.

Anonymous said...

... Our heart? They share a heart? >_<

Also, cool blog. Just sayin. =P I've read most of it.

Anonymous said...

Could it be that the two are Conjoined Twins, and one of them died after a month?

Fai said...

The Baby wasn't even born? maybe just one month in the mother's womb when it died? So this person must be seeing the ghost of the baby and shared sweets with him. Thats what I thought

Yoku said...

feding sweets to a one month old infant?I'd say suffocated.But It is probally true that they might have been poisoned.But they didn't poison the baby brother.
And Then, They could of eaten the brother.Well, thats only my theory.
Thanks for posting this, Saya!

Anonymous said...

i took it as the baby brother was the sweets.

Anonymous said...

Speaking from the perspective of a mother here: a one month old baby is incapable even of rolling over on their own or holding their head up steadily. If you give a baby a sweet at that age, that baby will choke on that sweet. No need for poison or other nonsense- just an innocent sweet choking a baby. The older brother was not aware what he did would kill his brother, but it did. It's scary because it's not only possible, it happens every once in a while.

Anonymous said...

What I got was that the mother was trying to poison theolder child but the older child gave it to the month-old brother.

noobyman said...

it says 'our heart' not 'our hearts' which i guess means they were conjoined twins, and he happened to be older by, you know, a few minutes (you know how twins and their parents say ones older). they gave one something to choke on, so they would have one, and the younger one died. thats what i think anyway.

Joelle Seung Won Jung said...

You guys are thinking too much. Saya-chan said so herself, THE BABY BROTHER CHOKED ON THE SWEETS.
Geez.

Evil Carbonara said...

Hi, Saya-san! I've just found your blog and I must say....I quite like it!

(ne, the little brother was just a month old, right? wouldn't he have choked from the boiled sweets? babies can't be trusted to be left aloe for even a few minutes!)

SAYA said...

@Evil Carbonara: My, my! Your name disturbs me, dear! Can one of my favourite Italian dishes be evil?? I would be scared to taste your dish!

I'm glad you like my blog! :D

And yes I agree, all babies should put be put under 24-hr surveillance!